Bernanke’s Remedy: Pump More Blood Into a Corpse

By Mike WhitneyInformation Clearing House” — Credit is everything. Without credit expansion there’s no recovery because there’s no pick-up in overall demand. But credit growth is going backwards. The banks have tightened lending standards and the pool of credit-worthy applicants has vanished. Bank lending is off 14 per cent since October 2008. Private credit is presently decreasing at a 10.5 per cent annual rate. The situation is getting worse, not better.

October 05, 2009 “

From the UK Telegraph:

“Both bank credit and the M3 money supply in the United States have been contracting at rates comparable to the onset of the Great Depression since early summer, raising fears of a double-dip recession in 2010 and a slide into debt-deflation…

“Similar concerns have been raised by David Rosenberg, chief strategist at Gluskin Sheff, who said that over the four weeks up to August 24, bank credit shrank at an ‘epic’ 9pc annual pace, the M2 money supply shrank at 12.2pc and M1 shrank at 6.5pc.

“’For the first time in the post-Second World War era, we have deflation in credit, wages and rents and, from our lens, this is a toxic brew,’he said. (Ambrose Evans-Pritchard, “US credit shrinks at Great Depression rate prompting fears of double-dip recession”, UK Telegraph)

Foreclosures, delinquencies and defaults are all up. Foreclosure activity is currently at 300,000-plus per month and rising. A huge shadow inventory is being kept off-market to maintain prices. The drip, drip, drip-effect of excess inventory dumped onto the market will keep housing in the doldrums for a decade. Homeowners are unable to borrow on underwater homes. Everything points to a long-term slump in spending.

Corporations are finding it harder to roll over their debt, bank loans are defaulting at a historic pace, and commercial real estate is imploding. Credit destruction is unprecedented, massive and ongoing. The capital hole is bigger than the Fed and bigger than the Treasury. It can’t be plugged with liquidity alone.

For now, the government can fiddle GDP with $800 billion infusion of stimulus, but what happens when the political will for more deficit spending dissipates? What happens when foreign investors demand the Fed stop writing checks on an overdrawn account?

The Fed has fixed nothing. The banks are still underwater, output is at record lows, and unemployment is climbing towards 10 per cent. Fed chair Ben Bernanke’s multi-trillion dollar rescue programs have kept a wobbly system upright, but nothing more. The economy’s underlying problems are still the same. The Fed’s quantitative easing (monetization) program has sent stocks surging, but done nothing to stimulate the economy. That’s because equities bubbles have negligible impact on aggregate demand; there’s no knock-on effect. The real economy is still flatlining while Wall Street parties on. Bernanke’s plan has been a total wash.

The government cannot deficit spend forever. Eventually, GDP will have to depend on wage growth and credit expansion. Given the political and institutional bias against labor, (and opposition to wages that rise with productivity) the only way to fuel the economy is through credit growth. And there’s the rub. Households have lost nearly $14 trillion in wealth since the crisis began and are in no position to resume borrowing at pre-crisis levels. Consumers are cutting back on spending and paying down debt. They have no other choice.

This is from Bloomberg News:

“Americans plan to refrain from boosting their spending even after the biggest drop in consumption since 1980, signaling concern about the direction of the economy over the next six months.

“Only 8 per cent of U.S. adults plan to increase household spending, almost one-third will spend less, and 58 per cent expect to ‘stay the course,’ a Bloomberg News poll showed. More than 3 in 4 said they reduced spending in the past year.

“Underscoring consumers’ austere attitudes, 77 per cent of respondents said they have cut back on spending during the past year, 59 percent said they have made a bigger effort to pay off debts and 48 percent have put more money aside as savings.” (Bloomberg News)

Savings are up and spending is down. The economy is headed into a long-term funk; the “new normal”. The Fed’s sleight-of-hand programs and Obama’s stimulus elixir haven’t changed the prevailing downward trend. If anything, they have made matters worse. Consider this from Janet Tavakoli, author of “Dear Mr. Buffett” in an interview with Max Keiser:

“Regarding the outlook, my analysis is grim. I am not a doomsayer, I follow the cash, and so far, I’ve been correct, and the government has been wrong. Here’s the situation. We are at greater risk of a total meltdown due to a deflationary collapse than we were in 2007. After the greatest Ponzi scheme in the history of the capital markets, we’ve seen history’s greatest fiscal and monetary expansion, but it hasn’t worked. Debt levels of consumers and business exceed the capacity to repay.” (Janet Tavakoli On The Edge With Max Keiser)

The Fed has done nothing to restructure the financial system so the same problems which killed Lehman and thrust the global economy into a tailspin, persist today. When the stimulus runs out and the Fed ends its $1.25 trillion purchase of (Fannie and Freddie) mortgage-backed securities and $300 billion in US Treasuries, interest rates will rise, housing prices will tumble, and the economy will nosedive. Bernanke will be forced back to the printing presses, the only hope for reversing the deflationary spiral. This will trigger the next crisis, a run on the dollar.

This is from an article by Alice Schroeder of Bloomberg News:

“In all the talk of inflation because the Treasury is printing so much money versus deflation because it may not print enough, there is one type of inflation that is rarely discussed. This is the mega-inflation caused by a sudden currency devaluation. Currency is like any financial innovation, an obligation secured by assets. When the obligation is perceived to have increased far beyond the level justifiable by the assets, which in this case make up a country’s economy, a bubble has formed……Right now, the American economy is worth less than the value implied by the market value of its obligations.” (Gold Tells You U.S. Bubble Hasn’t Popped Yet: Alice Schroeder, Bloomberg)

The system crashed because it was built on the false assumption that an unregulated shadow banking system could generate an infinite amount of credit without sufficient capital. This proved to be wrong. Capitalism requires capital. The trillions of dollars in loans, complex debt-instruments, off-balance sheet operations and derivatives contracts were all stacked atop a tiny scrap of capital which eventually collapsed beneath the weight of the debt. This system (securitization) which created the mess, cannot be restored. It required a strong currency, artificially low interest rates, and credulous investors who were unaware of the inherent risks of illiquid assets. Those conditions no longer exist, nor have they for more than two years. Even so, the Fed continues to pump blood into a corpse hoping for some fleeting sign of life. This is why an even bigger crisis cannot be too far off.

Link to Article

Latest Monetary Policy Proposal From the Fed Puts Your Money Market Fund At Risk

The Federal Reserve is discussing the possibility of using “reverse repo” transactions with money market funds that would be aimed at draining liquidity from the financial system.  The transaction would involve swapping the toxic assets on the Fed’s balance sheet for part of the $3 trillion sitting in investor money market funds.  Typically a repo transaction is a policy tool used by the Fed and executed with the Fed’s primary dealers in order the “fine tune” systemic liquidity and regulate the Fed Funds rate.   They are short term in nature and involve swapping short term Treasuries in exchange for cash, with the Treasuries being the collateral in order to “guarantee” that the short term trade can be unwound with little or no risk.

Here’s the link to the article that revealed this proposal:  Fed Wants To Drain Money Market Funds

The current Fed proposal is based on the fact that the primary dealer system only has enough cash to drain $100 billion from the system.  Here’s what is really going on with this proposal (without getting into the technical details of how repos work):  

The Fed has purchased trillions of dollars of toxic assets from banks.  We don’t know what price the Fed paid and we don’t know how corrupted the underlying collateral is (the Fed refuses to disclose both pieces of valuable information).  Most of the securities involve severely distressed underlying collateral like credit card receivables, subprime mortgages, auto loans and now commercial real estate mortgages.  Most of these assets will eventually be worth less than 10 cents on the dollar.  If the Fed were to hold onto these assets, the Fed, and the banks that ultimately are the shareholders of the Fed, stand to lose trillions. 

What the Fed proposal would do would move these toxic nuclear waste assets from the Fed’s balance sheet and into money market funds, in exchange for cash sitting in the money market funds.  The biggest problem is the Fed has no basis for valuing these assets other than the price it paid the banks for them, so at what price will the Fed value these securities in order to establish the market value basis for the repo transaction?   In other words, the Fed can stick a random price on these assets and swap them for the cash in the money market funds and say “trust us, we’re Fed – we’ll make you whole.”  

Without going in-depth into the problems that could occur which might make the Fed’s promise wothless, this proposal, if made effective, would expose money market funds to a significant, if not catastrophic level of risk.  To be sure, each fund individually has charter limits which would put a cap on the amount of cash the Fed could “repo” out of the individual fund and replace it with garbage assets.  However, these assets were fraudulently rated AAA in the first place and have no business being put into money market funds.  Money market funds are supposed to be basically risk-free funds in which investors “park” cash and earn a small amount of interest.

At best, this is a move by the Fed to justify draining a large amount liquidity from the system by using one of its monetary tools to drain cash from money market funds.  This has never been done before and is well outside of the traditional boundaries of repo/reverse repo tool used by the Fed with primary dealers. At worst, I believe this is a veiled attempt by Bernanke to move toxic assets from the Fed’s balance sheet and onto the public, under the false pretenses of using money market funds  to drain liquidity from the system, rather than putting these near-worthless assets back on to the balance sheets of the Fed’s primary dealers.

Hopefully this idea goes away. If it does become reality, I would not, under any circumstances trust this situation and would withdraw all funds from any money market funds you own and either move the cash into gold or into a short term Treasury bond fund.

And Now: The Worldwide Crack-up Boom

French Kisses and Asset Inflation
By Bill Bonner and Addison Wiggin

A kiss is still a kiss…and a bubble is still a bubble. When a kiss is over, it’s over. When a bubble pops…well…that’s all she wrote! All kisses end — even the wettest “French” kisses. And so do all bubbles — even sloppy mega-bubbles of liquidity.

“This one will be no exception,” we remember thinking before the carnage got underway. But, of course, it’s not the certainties that make life interesting; it’s the uncertainties — the known unknowns and the unknown unknowns, as Mr. Rumsfeld said. We are all born of woman and end up where all men born of women end up — dead. But that doesn’t mean we can’t have some fun between baptism and last rites.

The worldwide financial bubble we faced was both worldlier, and more financial than any in history.

And, in the summer of 2007, it was still very much alive. So much alive that the media could hardly keep up with it. Forbes magazine, for example, tried to estimate the wealth of the world’s richest people. But the rich don’t typically give out their balance sheets, telephone numbers, and home addresses. So, there’s a fair amount of guesswork in the calculations.

When it came to guesstimating the net worth of Stephen Schwarzman, founder of Blackstone, the Forbes crew wandered off into fiction. They put his wealth at about $2 billion. Recent filings in connection with the new Blackstone IPO show he earned that much in a single year!

In that phase of the bubble, it is as if your neighbors were throwing a wild party and you weren’t invited. You detest them…envy them…and want to join them, all at once. A very small part of the population is having a ball; everyone else is getting restless and wondering when the noise will stop.

Meanwhile, the experts, commentators, kibitzers, and analysts were saying that there is a whole new phase of the giant bubble about to unfold; things could get a whole lot crazier. Even many of our respected colleagues were pointing to a text by the great Austrian economist, Ludwig von Mises, for a clue. What we have here, they say, is what Mises described as a “Crack-Up Boom.”

Before we go on, readers should be aware that the “Austrian school” of economics is probably the best theory about the way the world works. Like our newsletter, The Daily Reckoning, it is suspicious of efforts to control the natural workings of an economy, in general…and suspicious of central banking, in particular. The fact that it was a one-time “Austrian,” Alan Greenspan, who became the most celebrated central banker in history, only increases our suspicions. He was able to master central banking, we imagine, because he understood what it really is — a swindle.

What Is a “Crack-Up Boom?”

Von Mises:

This first stage of the inflationary process may last for many years. While it lasts, the prices of many goods and services are not yet adjusted to the altered money relation. There are still people in the country who have not yet become aware of the fact that they are confronted with a price revolution which will finally result in a considerable rise of all prices, although the extent of this rise will not be the same in the various commodities and services. These people still believe that prices one day will drop. Waiting for this day, they restrict their purchases and concomitantly increase their cash holdings. As long as such ideas are still held by public opinion, it is not yet too late for the government to abandon its inflationary policy.

But then, finally, the masses wake up. They become suddenly aware of the fact that inflation is a deliberate policy and will go on endlessly. A breakdown occurs. The crack-up boom appears. Everybody is anxious to swap his money against ‘real’ goods, no matter whether he needs them or not, no matter how much money he has to pay for them. Within a very short time, within a few weeks or even days, the things which were used as money are no longer used as media of exchange. They become scrap paper. Nobody wants to give away anything against them.

It was this that happened with the Continental currency in America in 1781, with the French mandats territoriaux in 1796, and with the German mark in 1923. It will happen again whenever the same conditions appear. If a thing has to be used as a medium of exchange, public opinion must not believe that the quantity of this thing will increase beyond all bounds. Inflation is a policy that cannot last.

Mises is describing the lunatic phases of a classic inflationary cycle.

At first, no one can tell the difference between a real dollar — one that is earned, saved, invested or spent—and one that just came off the printing presses. They figure that the new dollar is as good as the old one. And then, prices rise…and people don’t know what to make of it. Later, they begin to catch on…and all Hell breaks loose.

You see, if you could really get rich by printing more currency, Zimbabweans would all be as rich as Midas, since the Mugabe government runs the presses night and day.

Von Mises died in 1973 — long before this boom really got going — let alone cracked up. He may never have heard of a hedge fund…or even a derivative, for that matter. A world money system without gold? He probably couldn’t have imagined it. People spending millions of dollars for a Warhol? Twenty million for a house in Mayfair? Chinese stocks at 40 times earnings? He would have chuckled in disbelief. He understood how national currency bubbles expand and how they pop, but he probably never would have imagined how insane things could get when you have a whole world monetary system in bubble mode.

He’d have recognized the beginning of this bubble…and he’d have recognized the end, but the middle…or the beginning of the end — that would have dumbfounded him. During his lifetime he saw a Crack Up Boom in Germany in the ’20s…and a few more here…but he never saw a worldwide Crack Up Boom.

No one, anywhere, has ever seen a worldwide Crack Up Boom. We’re the first, ever. Pretty exciting, huh?

Where Has all the Money Gone? … This is a Recovery?

By Mike Whitney

The slight rebound in housing looks a lot different when one considers how much the Fed is meddling in the market. Fed chair Ben Bernanke has purchased $240 billion in US Treasuries to keep long-term interest rates artificially low while–at the same time–buying $740 billion in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac mortgage-backed securities (MBS) to provide the financing for new home buyers. It’s the double-whammy; and that’s not all. Bernanke plans to continue buying agency MBS (monetization) until he reaches $1.45 trillion, which will make Uncle Sam the biggest player in the housing market by far. How’s that for central planning?

Ironically, the funds for Bernanke’s housing market rescue plan were never approved by Congress, which means that the Fed committed nearly-$2 trillion with “no down” payment. That makes the Fed’s Treasury buyback program the biggest subprime loan of all time. 

   The fact is, all the recent gains in home sales are all the result of direct government intervention. If interest rates were allowed to rise (as the would naturally) or if  Congress withdrew its $8,000 first-time home-buyer subsidy, or if FHA tightened its loosey-goosey financing (which requires just 3.5% down payment and low FICO scores, the same as subprime!) home prices and sales would continue to drop at a 10 to 15 percent year-over-year rate. Housing has stopped plummeting for one reason alone; the Fed bought the market.

  The same rule applies to the stock market, where the Fed’s quantitative easing (QE) and liquidity injections have sparked a 6-month bear market rally sending equities to the moon. It’s all Fed intervention. A recent report by Egan-Jones Ratings And Analytics traces the Fed’s lavish liquidity handouts pointing out the precise sectors of the market that have been most effected:

  “Massive monetary stimulus is good for asset prices (stocks, bonds, houses, commodities) in a weak pricing environment and soft economy. The Federal Reserve has doubled its balance sheet from $1 Trillion to $2 Trillion effectively adding $1 Trillion to our economy. In addition, the Fed has through an alphabet soup of facilities i.e. Term Auction credit, Asset Backed Commercial Paper Money Market Mutual Fund Liquidity Facility, Term Asset Backed Securities Loan Facility, Primary Dealer and other Broker Dealer Credit, Other Credit Extensions, Term Facility, Maiden Lane LLC one, two and three, Money Market Investor Facility, added approximately $3 Trillion in loans and over $5.5 Trillion in guarantees of private investments. While these latter funds are technically loans, they get renewed regularly.

So where has all the money gone? The chart below shows the rise in the stock market causing the valuation to be somewhat extended in our view – some liquidity found a home here. Large rises in just the last month in small cap stocks, plus 17%; most shorted stocks, plus 17%; stocks with the lowest analyst rating out performing those with the highest rating by 380 basis points, all suggest some speculation……
Commodities have had a nice rebound from their lows with copper hitting new highs. High yield bonds have out performed investment rated bonds as investors are willing to bet on a faster recovery and start to reach for yield.
These are indications of excess liquidity finding outlets.” ( “Fundamentally…Disconnected”  Egan-Jones Ratings And Analytics, hat tip zero hedge.com)

Let’s summarize: The Fed is goosing the stock market and subsidizing the housing market. Bernanke has slashed interest rates to zero percent, underwritten the entire financial system with $12.8 trillion in loans and guarantees, and flooded the financial system with liquidity. The Fed has  also doubled its balance sheet to $2.08 trillion which is the equivalent of dropping the Fed Funds rate to -1 percent.  As Mark Gongloff of the Wall Street Journal opines, “The Fed is essentially paying people to borrow money.”

Indeed, the Fed has done its level-best to keep the market from correcting, but isn’t it a bit of a stretch to call it a “recovery”?

In truth,  Bernanke is in a pitch-battle with deflation and the outcome is still uncertain. Deflation has spread to every sector of the economy; retail, travel, luxury items, autos, building supplies, home furnishings, electronics. No business has been spared. The C.P.I. inflation-gauge has slipped into negative territory and is now at -2.1 percent. Prices are headed down and spending is falling fast. Unemployment is soaring, wages are dropping, and the average work-week has been sliced to just 33 hrs. And, as we noted, housing prices have flattened out, but only because of unprecedented government intervention into the market. Otherwise, real estate would still be stretched out on a marble slab.

  Most people think it should be easy to beat deflation. They think all the Fed has to do is flip a switch and print more money. But there’s more to it than that, especially when trillions of dollars in credit suddenly vanishes in a poof of smoke. That’s what happened last September when Lehman Bros imploded and reduced the financial system to rubble. Global stock markets crashed, interbank lending collapsed, capital flows stopped, and payrolls and inventories were slashed. The gigantic credit-purge thrust the economy into deflation, a condition which persists to this day.

 Economist Irving Fisher tackled the problem of deflation 76 years ago  in his masterpiece “Debt-Deflation Theory of the Great Depression”. Fisher showed how over-indebtedness eventually triggers a chain of events beginning with debt liquidation and ending in distress selling, huge capital losses, and violent economic contraction; the same challenge that Bernanke faces today.

Irving Fisher:

“Unless some counteracting cause comes along to prevent the fall in the price level, such a depression as that of 1929-33 tends to continue, going deeper, in a vicious spiral, for many years. There is then no tendency of the boat to stop tipping until it has capsized….

On the other hand, it is always economically possible to stop or prevent such a depression simply by reflating the price level up to the average level at which outstanding debts were contracted by existing debtors and assumed by existing creditors, and then maintaining that level unchanged.” (Irving Fisher)

Clearly,  Bernanke is following Fisher’s advice and doing everything in his power  to reflate asset prices and avoid a bigger crash. But it’s still too soon to tell whether his strategy will work. We’re still in the early innings of a humongous system wide credit-implosion event.  
 
 The term “deflation” relates to a drop in the general price level, something not seen in the United States since the Great Depression. As economist John Bellamy Foster points out,  deflation squeezes corporate profits even if costs and productivity remain the same.  When profits fall, heavy layoffs and wage reductions ensue.  

John Bellamy Foster:  “But the real fear of deflation has to do with the enormously bloated financial structure and the huge debt load of the economy…  In a deflationary economy,  debt has to be paid back with bigger dollars (worth more over time).  This then creates a debt-deflation spiral, enormously accelerating financial meltdown.  As Fisher put it, “deflation caused by the debt reacts on the debt.  Each dollar of debt still unpaid becomes a bigger dollar, and if the over-indebtedness with which we started was great enough, the liquidation of debt cannot keep up with the fall of prices which it causes.”  Stated differently, quoting from The Great Financial Crisis (p. 116), “prices fall as debtors sell assets to pay their debts, and as prices fall the remaining debts must be repaid in dollars more valuable than the ones borrowed, causing more defaults, leading to yet lower prices, and thus a deflationary spiral.” (Interview of John Bellamy Foster on the Great Financial Crisis, Monthly Review) http://www.monthlyreview.org/mrzine/foster270209.html

It is this “deflationary spiral” that Bernanke is trying to avoid at all cost, even if he destroys the currency in the process. (Which he appears to be doing) Despite the Fed chairman’s steely resolve, the economy has continued its historic nosedive. Consumer spending is falling and households are limiting themselves to the bare essentials. (US households lost $14 trillion in wealth in the last year alone.) Families everywhere are paring back their credit, paying down their debts and rebuilding their nest eggs with what’s left from their skimpy paychecks. Unfortunately, what’s good for the family balance sheet is poison for the economy.

From Bloomberg News: “U.S. consumer credit plunged more than five times as much as forecast in July as banks maintained more restrictive lending terms and job losses made households reluctant to borrow.

Consumer credit fell by a record $21.6 billion, or 10 percent at an annual rate, to $2.5 trillion, according to a Federal Reserve report released today in Washington. Credit dropped by $15.5 billion in June, more than previously estimated. Credit fell for a sixth month, the longest series of declines since 1991. (Bloomberg)

US households and consumers have never been as strapped as they are today. They’re dealing with recession the only way they can, by pulling back and hunkering down. That will make it even harder for Bernanke to resuscitate the economy. There’s simply no way to force people to borrow when they’re not interested.  

Bernanke’s deflation-fighting strategy needs to be revamped. The country doesn’t need another credit bubble. The surge in delinquencies, defaults and personal bankruptcies all suggest that the era of easy money and lax lending standards is over. Why not “hang it up” for good. The Fed should be focused on rebuilding the economy from the ground up, paying particular attention to aggregate demand. Demand is what keeps the mighty GDP-flywheel in motion. Wall Street likes to stimulate demand through credit expansion and bubblenomics so they can skim fat bonuses on the front end and then bail out before stocks crash. But this perennial “boom and bust” cycle get’s old for ordinary working people, who just want a little stability and a paycheck that keeps pace with inflation. The best way to avoid “demand shock”–which is at the heart of every recession–is through wage growth and full employment. It’s that simple. When workers get better pay, they buy more more stuff and the economy thrives. Everybody wins!

European Economic Recovery – The ECB May Have Got It Right

I have read a number of articles and research report which throw darts at the European Central bank for not being more aggressive with ‘quantitative easing’ and stimulus efforts. These latest reports indicate to me that the ECB may have played it ‘just right’. I know it won’t be clear sailing from here, and that the European recovery will still have some bumps, but the ECB left some powder dry and will be able to step in again if needed. And if the recovery sticks in Europe, the ECB won’t have near as much manufactured liquidity to pull in from the markets.

And I’m sure some readers will question how I can trumpet the recovery in Europe while at the same time believing the recovery here in the US won’t have legs. The main difference is what is fueling these recoveries. While many, including your current Pfennig writer, are in the opinion that the nascent recovery here in the US has mainly been driven by government stimulus; you can’t say the recovery in Germany and France is being driven by government intervention. Digging into the recent positive data here in the US shows the government is responsible for most of the spending; the private sector has largely stayed on the sidelines. The recovery in Europe, on the other hand, is being fueled by increased consumer confidence and internal private sector demand. In fact, many of the dollar bulls have continually chastised the European governments for not taking a more aggressive role in providing stimulus to their economies.

England and the US have yet to feel the inflationary impact of their budget busting ‘quantitative easing’ programs; but believe me, inflation is lurking just around the corner. While the US’s Bernanke and UK’s Darling have chosen to ignore the future consequences of these programs, Trichet and the ECB always kept a hawkish eye looking toward the future.

Chris Gaffney, CFA
Vice President
EverBank World Markets

It’s All About The Money!

As I listen to the Wall Street pundits today, their latest line is about “the inevitable rally” that they claim is coming.  One guy went so far as to pronounce on TV that “the market is severely oversold”. Anything is possible in the stock market, because it’s driven as much by emotion as fundamentals, but I wouldn’t count on seeing a substantial uptick anytime soon.  Mostly I expect that recovery will be snail-slow, after further decline, and we’ll see DOW 4000 or 5000 much sooner than 8000. I also expect that there will be many more “surprises”.  Sure hope I’m wrong – but don’t think so.

 

With all the talk about the RESULTS of the economic downturn – manufacturing drops, real estate contraction, lost jobs, etc. – it’s hard to keep track of the CAUSE.  It’s all about the money!

 

The mess the financial institutions created has frozen liquidity.  Economies run on money.  Without credit, the whole thing comes to a screeching halt.  That’s where we are now.

 

I talked in an earlier article about one analysis which has 700 US banks in trouble, with 150 in danger of failing this year.  It’s common knowledge that Citi is in deep trouble, and apparently sliding by the day.  GE’s a mess. The rumor mill has JP Morgan in deep, deep trouble.  Who knows which finance house is next?  We can’t measure the full extent of the problem because it’s a state secret – the banks, the Fed & the government aren’t talking.  We can’t even find out who already got bailouts, or how much; because the government in its infinite wisdom has decided that the info. should be confidential.  We also know that overseas banks are in trouble, and the forex/derivatives/debt mess in Eastern Europe is threatening to spill over, bringing a whole new set of problems measurable in $ Trillions.  All these banks are intertwined.  If a big foreign bank goes, what will be the effect here in the US?

 

Here’s the problem.  Without credit we can’t do business and we’ll just continue to slide.  In order to get credit moving again, the government has to spend more money bailing-out the finance houses (the bailouts so far have had little positive effect).  I strongly suspect the problem is much bigger than the public is allowed to know, and it will really come down to a question of whether the government can “print” enough dollars to break the logjam without destroying the dollar in the process.  Then there’s the little problem of getting someone to buy all the government debt created in the process.  The foreign governments that have been financing us for years are in trouble too.  Even though our economies are all intertwined, someone might decide to follow a different path of self-interest.  If that happens, we’re in big trouble.  I can’t remember a time when our country was more vulnerable to foreign “blackmail” than now.

 

Until the credit logjam is resolved, all other questions of economic health are on hold.  We, and the world at large, will continue to decline.  Obama’s plans won’t do squat without a credit thaw.  The portion of his package dedicated to the finance mess is just a drop in the bucket – barely an opening gambit.

 

There are always business opportunities; in any economy.  I mentioned one I like in my last article.  But now is not a good time to buy into the “Wall Street propaganda”.  It’s dangerous out there, and declining daily.  Be very, very careful.

 

We just need to hope that our secretive government & Fed can get a handle on the liquidity freeze.  Once they do, we need to hope that inflation & taxes don’t eat up our remaining wealth.

 

Buy Gold.