14 FACTS OBAMA DOESN’T WANT YOU TO KNOW

FOURTEEN  FACTS OBAMA DOESN’T WANT YOU TO KNOW:

1. Prosecution For Financial Fraud Hit A 20-Year Low During The Obama Administration (There were more prosecutions during every year of George W. Bush’s presidency than during every year of Obama’s).
2. Income Inequality Is Worse Under Obama Than Under Bush (The gap between the rich and the poor was more pronounced under Obama’s presidency than under George W. Bush’s).
3. Obama Wants To Lower The Corporate Tax Rate (Obama proposed a tax overhaul that would cut the corporate tax rate from 35 percent to 28 percent).
4. Obamacare Won’t Make Health Care Cheaper For Most Americans (After Massachusetts enacted a similar health care plan in 2006, premiums for an individual plan in the state rose 18 percent over three years).
5. Obama’s Housing Programs Have Largely Been A Failure (In 2009, Obama announced the Home Affordable Mortgage Program, promising to help 3 to 4 million borrowers, but as of January — more than three years into the program — HAMP had only reached 1 million borrowers).
6. Homeowners Haven’t Seen Much Out Of That Huge Mortgage Deal (As part of the settlement, banks said they would offer at least $10 billion in loan forgiveness to homeowners. But months after the deal was inked, banks have been slow to hand out the money).
7. Democrats Have Received Lots Of Campaign Cash From Bain Employees (Democratic candidates and committees had actually netted double the amount of campaign cash from Bain workers as of May than their Republican counterparts since 2008, according to the Boston Globe).
8. Goldman And Other Wall St. Firms Have Largely Escaped Punishment For Their Role In The Financial Crisis (The announcement last month that the Justice Department wouldn’t be prosecuting Goldman Sachs over allegations surrounding the financial crisis was a reminder for many that the Obama Administration has largely let banks off the hook for their role in the meltdown).
9. The Wall Street “Revolving Door” Is Alive And Well In Obama Administration (Many current and former members of the Obama Administration have ties to Wall Street. The list includes the president’s current and former chiefs of staff — Jacob Lew and Bill Daley, respectively — as well as his former budget director, Peter Orszag, and others).
10. “Too Big To Fail” Banks Have Grown Under Obama (At the end of 2011, five big banks, including Bank of America and JPMorgan Chase, held 56 percent of the U.S. economy, according to Bloomberg, compared to 43 percent five years earlier. That’s right, the too-big-to-fail banks have actually gotten bigger).
11. The U.S. Has Gained A Lot Of Low-Wage Jobs During The Recovery (Most of the jobs lost during the recession paid middle wages, while most of those gained during the recovery were low-wage jobs, according to a recent study from the National Employment Law Project).
12. Incomes Declined More During The Recovery Than The Recession (Median household income fell 6.7 percent between June 2009, when the recession technically ended, and June 2011, according to a Census Bureau study cited by The New York Times. That’s more than the 3.2 percent incomes fell during the recession, between 2007 and 2009).
13. Payroll Tax Cut May Expire On Obama’s Watch (The White House won’t be pushing for another payroll tax cut extension this year).
14. Many Top Obama Donors Are Employees Of Major Corporations (Of the top 10 companies with employees donating money to Obama’s campaign, three are big banks: JPMorgan Chase, Citigroup and Goldman Sachs, according to the Center for Responsive Politics. Some of Obama’s other major contributors include employees from big companies such as Microsoft and Google).

Source:    Huffington Post:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/11/15/fiscal-cliff-richard-trumka-unions_n_2134229.html?utm_hp_ref=politics#slide=more248394

Scroll Down Page

Hogwash, Mr. President

By Robert Scheer

January 26, 2011 “Truthdig” – -What is the state of the union? You certainly couldn’t tell from that platitudinous hogwash that the president dished out Tuesday evening. I had expected Barack Obama to be his eloquent self, appealing to our better nature, but instead he was mealy-mouthed in avoiding the tough choices that a leader should delineate in a time of trouble. He embraced clean air and a faster Internet while ignoring the depth of our economic pain and the Wall Street scoundrels who were responsible-understandably so, since they so prominently populate the highest reaches of his administration. He had the effrontery to condemn “a parade of lobbyists” for rigging government after he appointed the top Washington representative of JPMorgan Chase to be his new chief of staff.

The speech was a distraction from what seriously ails us: an unabated mortgage crisis, stubbornly high unemployment and a debt that spiraled out of control while the government wasted trillions making the bankers whole. Instead the president conveyed the insular optimism of his fat-cat associates: “We are poised for progress. Two years after the worst recession most of us have ever known, the stock market has come roaring back. Corporate profits are up. The economy is growing again.” How convenient to ignore the fact that this bubble of prosperity, which has failed the tens of millions losing their homes and jobs, was floated by enormous government indebtedness now forcing deep cuts in social services including state financial aid for those better-educated students the president claims to be so concerned about.

His references to education provided a convenient scapegoat for the failure of the economy, rather than to blame the actions of the Wall Street hustlers to whom Obama is now sucking up. Yes, it is an obvious good to have better-educated students to compete with other economies, but that is hardly the issue of the moment when all of the world’s economies are suffering grievous harm resulting from the irresponsible behavior of the best and the brightest here at home. It wasn’t the students struggling at community colleges who came up with the financial gimmicks that produced the Great Recession, but rather the super-whiz-kid graduates of the top business and law schools.

What nonsense to insist that low public school test scores hobbled our economy when it was the highest-achieving graduates of our elite colleges who designed and sold the financial gimmicks that created this crisis. Indeed, some of the folks who once designed the phony mathematical formulas underwriting subprime mortgage-based derivatives won Nobel prizes for their effort. A pioneer in the securitization of mortgage debt, as well as exporting jobs abroad, was one Jeffrey Immelt, the CEO of GE, whom Obama recently appointed to head his new job creation panel.

That the financial meltdown at the heart of our economic crisis was “avoidable” and not the result of long-run economic problems related to education and foreign competition is detailed in a sweeping report by the Democratic majority on the Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission to be released as a 576-page book on Thursday. In a preview reported in The New York Times, the commission concluded: “The greatest tragedy would be to accept the refrain that no one could have seen this coming and thus nothing could have been done. If we accept this notion, it will happen again.”

Just the warning that Obama has ignored by continually appointing the very people who engineered this crisis, mostly Clinton alums, to reverse its ongoing dire consequences. As the Times reports: “The decision in 2000 to shield the exotic financial instruments known as over-the-counter derivatives from regulation, made during the last year of President Bill Clinton’s term, is called ‘a key turning point in the march toward the financial crisis.’ “

Obama appointed as his top economic adviser Lawrence Summers, who as Clinton’s treasury secretary was the key architect of that “turning point,” and Summers protégé Timothy Geithner as his own treasury secretary. The unanimous finding of the 10 Democrats on the commission is that Geithner, who had been president of the New York Fed before Obama appointed him, “could have clamped down” on excesses by Citigroup, the subprime mortgage leader that Geithner and the Fed bailed out along with other unworthy banking supplicants.

Profligate behavior that has hobbled the economy while running up an enormous debt that Obama now uses as an excuse for a five-year freeze on discretionary domestic spending cuts that small part of the budget that might actually help ordinary people. Speaking of our legacy of deficit spending, Obama stated, “… in the wake of the financial crisis, some of that was necessary to keep credit flowing, save jobs, and put money in people’s pockets. But now that the worst of the recession is over, we have to confront the fact that our government spends more than it takes in.”

Why now? It is an absurd demarcation to freeze spending when so many remain unemployed just because corporate profits, and therefore stock market valuations, seem firm. Ours is a union divided between those who agree with Obama that “the worst of the recession is over” and the far larger number in deep pain that this president is bent on ignoring.

Please visit the Truthdig website

THE COFFIN SHAPED RECOVERY

THE COFFIN SHAPED RECOVERY

While often wrong, Bernanke is right about the recession. It’s almost over. But a depression is about to replace it.

There has been much discussion about this recovery, whether it will be a “U”, “V” or a “W” shaped recovery. The answer is none of the above. It is going to be “C -shaped” recovery, but not as in the letter “C” but as in coffin.

 

 

The Coffin-Shaped Recovery

It would be a miracle if trillions of dollars of debt could be wiped out with one stock market crash and be succeeded by a new bull market driven by another large offering of credit by the Fed.

But such a central bank-engineered miracle today is impossible. Capitalism’s natural cycles derive from central banker’s unnatural infusion of credit into previously free markets. The subsequent distortion causes market demand to expand (which everybody loves) only to be followed by the inevitable contraction—which everybody hates.

Usually, central banks wait until previous levels of excess credit have been absorbed in an economic downturn before embarking on a fresh round of credit creation. This time, however, it is different.

This time, the cumulative buildup of debt over previous cycles where contractions were cut short to minimize economic pain and attendant political consequences is now so large that any contraction is sufficient to bring down the extraordinary backlog of debt built up over previous cycles.

The current contraction is more than sufficient to do so as it is more severe than any downturn since the 1930s; and despite the frantic attempts of central banks to contain the cumulative forces unleashed by previous cycles of credit and debt, the enormous but fragile paper-based economy built by central bankers’ paper money is now collapsing.

To hopefully prevent the collapse from reaching its catastrophic end, central bankers have now intervened far earlier and with far more credit hoping to prevent the day of reckoning, a reckoning soon to be evidenced by an historic deflationary depression that will wipe out all accumulated unpayble debts, albeit at the cost of a functioning world economy.

Such is Ben Bernanke’s considerable task. Despite his outwardly positive demeanor, Bernanke is well aware that his desperate gamble hasn’t worked.

In these times, the last thing you want to be is Ben Bernanke’s sphincter.

(note: Martha declined to produce my relevant cartoon)

KEYNESIAN COPS, FRIEDMAN’S FOLLIES, AND THE FLAWED THEORY BEHIND THE RECOVERY

The current chairman of the US central bank is Ben Bernanke, a self-described student of the Great Depression; but, learning is limited by what is taught and regarding the Great Depression, Bernanke’s teacher unfortunately was Milton Friedman.

The reason why central bankers (and Ben Bernanke in particular) are flooding the global economy with money, i.e. borrowed, printed, or monetized out of thin air with such abandon (who would have thought bankers could act with abandon except, of course, when believing risk is non-existent and they’re betting someone else’s money), is because of Milton Friedman’s theory, to wit that economic contractions can be reversed by sufficient monetary expansion.

Laid bare, Freidman’s theory is another iteration of the Keynesian belief in the power of government intervention, albeit an intervention cloaked in Friedman’s more palatable—at least to those on the right—conservative garb.

Friedman argued that if the Fed had aggressively expanded the money supply in the 1930s, it would have then counteracted deflationary forces and prevented the Great Depression, an argument unfortunately as flawed as another of Friedman’s pet theories, i.e. thatfloating exchange rates would naturally over time bring global trade deficits into balance.

Note: When exchange rates were allowed to float in 1974 as encouraged by Friedman who also encouraged Nixon to abandon the gold standard in 1971, the US had a positive balance of trade. Thirty five years later, the US trade deficit is well over $800 billion and is growing over $20 billion each month (Hey, Milton, how much more time will it take to balance the trade deficit?).

Professor Antal Fekete warned several years ago that Friedman would someday be proved wrong and that we would collectively suffer the consequences; and, that just as during the Great Depression when banks hoarded the government’s cheap money instead of lending it, they would do so again when Friedman’s theory of monetary expansion was tried during another contraction.

Professor Fekete’s warnings have now come true. Today, US bank lending growth has entered negative territory at the same time cash reserves at US banks increased by 1,460 %.

Frank Shostak in Does A Liquidity Trap Pose A Threat, 9/23/09, on mises.org writes:

The latest data for lending in the eurozone the United Kingdom, and the United States display a visible weakening. In the eurozone, the yearly rate of growth of bank lending to the private sector fell to 0.6% this July from 9.3% in July last year. In the United Kingdom, the yearly rate of growth of lending to the private sector fell to 2.2% in July 2009 from 10.1% in July 2008. In the United States, the rate of growth of lending plunged to minus 3.8% in August 2009 from a positive figure of 8.6% in August 2008…At the end of July this year, [however], US banks were sitting on $729 billion of cash against $1.9 billion in July last year.

http://mises.org/story/3697 [bracketed words, mine]

Friedman’s theory is flawed and as suspect as the paper money Friedman and Keynes both promoted. Central banks can print all the money they want but that will not necessarily increase the money supply as central bankers are discovering.

Severe monetary contractions that cause deflationary depressions are so powerful they, like monetary black holes, can destroy money faster than central banks can create it.

The on-going monetary contraction is now clearly evident. Ambrose Evans-Pritchard, columnist for The Telegraph UK, points out the glaring truth that Bernanke and most of his paper-weight brethren would like to avoid:

The US money supply has experienced the sharpest contraction in modern history, heightening the risk of a Wall Street crunch and a severe economic slowdown in coming months… the M3 ‘broad money” aggregates fell by almost $50bn (£26.8bn) in July, the biggest one-month fall since modern records began in 1959.

“Monthly data for July show that the broad money growth has almost collapsed,” said Gabriel Stein, the group’s leading monetary economist.

On a three-month basis, the M3 growth rate has fallen from almost 19pc earlier this year to just 2.1pc (annualised) for the period from May to July. This is below the rate of inflation, implying a shrinkage in real terms.

The growth in bank loans has turned negative to a halt since March…. shifts in M3 are a lead indicator of asset prices moves, typically six months or so ahead. If so, the latest collapse points to a grim autumn for Wall Street and for the American property market. As a rule of thumb, the data gives a one-year advance signal on economic growth, and a two-year signal on future inflation.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/economics/2795017/Sharp-US-money-supply-contraction-points-to-Wall-Street-crunch-ahead.html

This is not your mother’s contraction. Instead, this is the mother of all contractions, a contraction far greater than even that which sent the world into the Great Depression in the 1930s.

This time, the amounts owed are exponentially greater than what was owed in the 1930s; and, the greater the debts, the farther the fall. Debt does not just disappear without consequences, nor can it be outrun, sic outgrown, as economists are desperately hoping, especially today when economies are contracting, not expanding.

Economic contractions cannot be reversed by expanding the money supply any more than wishful thinking by itself will change the world. Despite the best efforts of central bankers like Ben Bernanke, Friedman’s flawed theory cannot save the world from what is now about to happen—the mother of all depressions that may be capitalism’s last.

Keynes and Friedman, both brilliant, were both believers in paper money. Paper money has many powers, not the least of which is the power to mislead and delude.

Milton Friedman thought a lot Of paper money and more Like Keynes and others who thought the same Milton showed gold the door And now our gold is spent and gone And so is Milton too And now we’re left bereft and broke Not knowing what to do But Ben Bernanke’s at the helm Of the sinking ship we’re on And soon like Milton and our gold We, too, will soon be gone So let’s make a toast while we’re still here To those who caused our ruin To those convinced that they were right But didn’t know what they were doing

WHO BENEFITS FROM THE FRAUD OF PAPER MONEY

The substitution of paper money for gold and silver has always been imposed by those who govern upon those governed; and, in the US it was done so illegally. The US Constitution explicitly defines the US dollar in silver, not paper money. The current regime of fiat money in the US is not only a monetary abomination, it is de jure unconstitutional.

The imposition of fiat money in the US was done without the consent of the governed. However, those who govern approved it. This is because the advantages of paper money accrue to those who rule; and it is in their interests, not society’s, that paper fiat money becomes the coin of the realm.

The disadvantages of paper money are borne by society-at-large, i.e. entrepreneurs, workers, businesses, retirees, savers, etc. who pay retail for the credit dispensed wholesale to those better connected, e.g. are you able to leverage your investments 50:1 as can JP Morgan Chase, Goldman Sachs, etc.; and, can you to carry your underwater investments at full book value and borrow against them as it does Wall Street? And were you bailed out last year as were the banks?

I have always been amazed at those who identify with a system that primarily serves the needs of others and only incidentally theirs. I can only conclude that such identification is symptomatic of low self-esteem, as self-interest alone would dictate otherwise.

We are now headed towards a rendering so extreme that such divisions will become clear and perhaps the many will finally cease identifying with a system that benefits the few closest to the fountainhead of credit while penalizing the many farther downstream which usually includes them.

Modern economics is a sophisticated Ponzi-scheme cross-pollinated with a shell game designed for the advantage of government, banks and those at the front of the line wherein money is created out of thin air to be loaned to others who will in the end be indebted beyond their means to repay and whose economic futures will be destroyed by the inevitable confluence of the bankers’ compounding interest and their constant inflation of the money supply.

 

If you doubt this is so, an article The Event by Eric Andrews, is a must read, especially the areas directly concerned with money and its creation. If you already believe this is so, Eric Andrew’s article is even more important. Clear, concise, and conclusive, it points out the inherent problems with our debt-based system of paper money, a system that contains its own seeds of destruction, seeds which are now flowering, www.financialsense.com/fsu/editorials/2009/0921.html.

Andrews also points out where we are and perhaps headed without guessing when we will arrive. We face a minefield of possible scenarios as deflation, inflation, hyperinflation, or a combination thereof may soon be in our future as the bankers’ paper money is now about to self-destruct.

THE BARRICKADE TO GOLD CRUMBLES

We are in the final stage of the paper-boys’ efforts to preserve their crumbling fiefdoms against gold’s advance. In truth, gold is not advancing at all. It is standing still. It is the constant decline in the value of paper money that makes it appear that gold is rising. Extant virtue needs no movement.

While I am in deep admiration of Professor Fekete’s insights on gold and money, I do not envy the price he paid for his learning. Professor Fekete’s understanding of monetary chaos derives from a childhood in Hungary beset by a hyperinflation more severe than even that of the Weimar Republic or Zimbabwe.

Professor Fekete then escaped communist oppression in Hungary to make his way to Canada where he received a front-seat look at the central bank and corporate collusion underpinning capitalism’s fraudulent paper-money scheme.

Upon retirement, Professor Fekete had invested his savings in Barrick Gold Corporation, a Canadian gold mining company. But instead of an expected return on his savings, the professor got an unexpected education in how Barrick assisted central banks in suppressing gold.

Barrick’s forward selling of unmined gold from 1988 to 2003 put thousands of ounces of paper gold on the market which forced down the price of physical gold. For years, the forwards sales of Barrick and Anglo-Gold Ashanti were responsible for the downward spiral of gold’s price, a goal desired by investment banks doing the bidding of central bankers.

Professor Fekete, as a shareholder, clearly understood that Barrick’s forward selling (or so-called hedging operations) came at the expense of shareholders. It did, however, directly benefit the central banks who wanted to cap the price of gold. Today, the “Barrick-cap”, a major “Barrickade” against gold’s rise is no more.

This month, on September 8, 2009, Barrick Gold Corporation announced it was taking a $5.9 billion charge against 3^rd quarter earnings in order to buy back all its forward contracts, a considerable sum to pay for succumbing to the wishes of those in power.

Once again, Professor Antal Fekete was right. Sponsored by the Gold Standard Institute, Professor Fekete will be in Canberra, Australia, November 2-5 speaking on “The World Financial Crisis and the Vanishing Gold Basis”, see http://www.professorfekete.com. I consider the Professor to be a light in these dark times. I and others will also be speaking.

It is absurd to discuss the price of gold without discussing central bank or government efforts to force the price of gold down, an effort that may soon be ending due to the imminent advent of the end-game.

In my Youtube video, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5o36Dj-ukPo, I discuss the possibility of whether or not the US will again confiscate gold. I wish the possibility were not so.

But, today, governments cannot see an alternative to that offered by central bankers, the merchants of debt who have enslaved nations with their fraudulent debt-based paper money. As yet, there are no alternatives to the bankers’ offerings. But after bankers and governments fall—and they will—alternatives will then become clear

Buy gold, buy silver, have faith.

Darryl Robert Schoon