US Banks ‘Foreclosured On record 1 Million Homes in 2010′

By BBCBBC” — – Banks repossessed a record one million US homes in 2010, and could surpass that number this year, figures show.

January 13, 2011 “

Foreclosure tracker RealtyTrac said about five million homeowners were at least two months behind on their mortgage payments.

Foreclosures are likely to remain numerous while unemployment remains stubbornly high, the group said.

Among the worst hit states were Nevada, Arizona, Florida and California, once at the heart of the housing boom.

Peak ahead

Nevada had the highest foreclosure rate for the fourth year in a row, with one in 11 housing units receiving a foreclosure notice, and RealtyTrac said more than half the nation’s foreclosures occurred in Arizona, California, Florida, Illinois and Michigan.

RealtyTrac said 2.9 million US households were subject to a foreclosure filing last year, up 1.67% from 2009.

“2011 is going to be the peak,” senior vice-president Rick Sharga told the Associated Press news agency.

Foreclosures slowed toward the end of 2010 amid revelations that banks had based the proceedings on improper documentation, but the pace is likely to rebound in the first quarter of 2011, Mr Sharga said.

California Sales & Use Tax on Indirect Costs Allocable to Defense Contracts

Years ago I lobbied successfully for a change to California regulations whereby Indirect Costs allocable to Defense Contracts were declared exempt from California Sales & Use Tax. I was successful in filing back-years claims for refunds, and in applying the rule-change on a go-forward basis.

The simple rule I used in calculating the refunds (which was accepted by the state) involved establishing the ratio of direct costs applicable to defense contracts vs. those that weren’t, and applying that ratio to the total sales & use taxes paid for indirect cost items. Word spread, and other California defense contractors did likewise.

In a recent conversation with a local Defense contractor, it came to my attention that some contractors may not be aware of this; especially those who are relatively new to the defense business.

If you’re in the defense business in California, you may want to take a look at your procedures.

This only pertains to the State of California. As mentoned in the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR), one must consult state -by- state regulations to determine the proper course of action.

Sorry, no jobs. This is California:

By Jim Christie – Analysis
SAN FRANCISCO (Reuters) – If you’re looking for work, don’t look in California.

The world’s eighth largest economy is still finding its feet after suffering multiple economic shocks, including a housing slump, mortgage crisis and recession.

Employers in California, the most populous U.S. state, are expected to keep cutting staff in 2010 as the wider U.S. jobs market recovers.

Link to Article

The Economy: Fixers Aim to Fix Fixes With Another Phony Fix

By Bill Bonner

From California comes word that the summer program of Singularity University came to an end this week. The idea of SU is simple enough. Put smart people together with the latest technology; let them figure out solutions to the world’s problems.

‘The Singularity’ is an idea from Ray Kurzweil. The gist of it is that computers will soon be smarter than humans; by the middle of this century they’ll be smart enough to figure out how to get smarter and smarter, faster and faster.

No doubt, many of them will go into finance. And no doubt, many will make a fast buck. But will more smartness really make the world a better place? According to the singularists, increased brainpower will be able to solve all sorts of problems – from global climate change to market crises.

But the brain is a big disappointment. No mechanical engineer has ever improved the old-fashioned kiss. Nor has any brain ever straightened out the business cycle. Dumb as a slide rule, the brain does what it is told to do; it doesn’t ask questions. Tell it to build a bridge and it is on the case. Put it to work packaging tranches of toxic assets or selling aluminum siding…it is just as happy with one task as with the next. And the more a man’s brain bends to a challenge, the more it elbows out of the way his finer senses…and the dumber the man becomes. He turns his back on his own intuition as well as the accumulated wisdom from previous bust- ups and bruises. Like a man who has gone crazy, as G.K. Chesterton put it, all he has left is his sense of reason. Then, with nothing more to work with, he comes down on his work like a blacksmith’s hammer on a fine Swiss watch.

During the bubble period, the big banks were the biggest employers of top graduates from the world’s top schools. Oxford, Cambridge, Harvard, Yale…the financial sector drew them in like flies to an open latrine. The financial industry made so much money it had a hard time explaining it. The smart dudes did not toil in the fields, neither did they spin. Then, what did they do? They earned millions, bought BMWs and got dates with actresses. They claimed they were doing a fine job of allocating the world’s wealth and making everyone better off.

But when the bubble blew up, it was apparent that the financial world they created was fragile and perverse. Not a single one of the largest Wall Street banks survived without government handouts. And a news report from this week tells us that Americans were so damaged by the Bubble Epoque that their discretionary spending has now been cut to levels not seen in 50 years. The geniuses wiped out a half- century of economic progress in the richest, most successful economy the world has ever seen.

Smart people were also to blame for the biggest single error of the last century: central planning. The central planners thought they could fix the supposed evils of the natural economy with logic and reason. The idea was so alluring half the world fell for it. If the Nobel Committee had been on the ball they would have given Karl Marx a prize.

If the bug had come from stupid people…smart people might have avoided it. They might have come through the period without permanent scaring. But the wheezy intellectuals behind it were too clever for their own good. They soon infected the top universities…and the government. They convinced almost everyone that central planning was the wave of the future and that anyone who stood against it was a bumpkin, a parasite or a fool. Then, in the name of human progress, they took control in two of the world’s largest countries and turned them into prison camps.

But by the last decades of the 20th century it was obvious even to central planners themselves that it wouldn’t work; in both Russia and China, the planners simply gave up.

Central planning didn’t work because people had plans of their own. They resisted. Then, the planners brought down their hammers. “If you’re going to make an omelet, you have to break some eggs,” said chef Vladimir Lenin. The “Black Book of Communism” puts the death toll as high as 100 million.

Then too, central planning didn’t work for less obvious reasons. Planning requires information. The planners had plenty of it. But private individuals had far more – local, current, more accurate information from first-hand observation and experience. With better information, they could make better plans. Most important, individuals didn’t limit themselves to only the fresh fruit of their rational brains. They put their hearts in it…and drew on instinct and tradition – the distilled spirits of previous generations – giving them a huge advantage over the apparatchiks.

But the brains kept at it. When the forensic experts sifted through the debris from the 2007-2008 financial blow-up they found fingerprints from a whole list of Nobel winners. It was they who had developed the formulae and the theories that deceived investors, and themselves. They believed they could tame risk…by calculation! They figured out the odds and worked out prices – to as many decimals as needed to put investors to sleep. And then along came a risk they had not foreseen – the risk that their own formulae were claptrap and that they were idiots.

Meanwhile, the brains were at work in the public sector too. There, they were still pushing central planning…albeit on a much less ambitious scale than in the last century. In Western countries, government economists fixed lending rates and credit policies in order to encourage over-consumption. In the East, they fixed exchange rates and recycled credit back to their customers in the West in order to encourage over-production. And what ho! Wouldn’t you know it; now the world has too much debt and too much capacity.

And so the brains are back on the job. In China, the government boosts production. In America, the central planners are trying to boost consumption. In short, the fixers are still fixing. And soon, the world will be in an even worse fix than it is now.

California Fights Frivolous Tax Arguments

The new penalties announced by the state’s Franchise Tax Board include a fine of $5,000 per offense for Californians who file a “frivolous submission” in an effort to “delay or impede the administration” of state or federal income tax laws.

Link to Article

Governator Considers Releasing Illegals from Prison

Governator considers releasing illegals from prison

WC Douglass…

Dear Friend,

In case you haven’t noticed, things are getting ugly in California. In fact, things are so bad in the cash-strapped state, Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger is even floating the idea of saving money by simply releasing all of the illegal immigrants currently serving time in the state’s prisons into the custody of the U.S. Immigration services so they can be deported.

California routinely turns over illegal immigrants to the federal authorities for deportation, but only after their prison sentences have been fully served. If put into practice, this idea would inundate a federal system that’s already struggling under the weight of millions of illegals with thousands more — all of them hardened criminals. And all to save the bungling California state budget $180 million (which seems like chump change by Obama stimulus package standards).

As you know, when it comes to the illegal immigration issue in this country, I’d be the first one to hold open the door back into Mexico — and also the one to double and triple check the locks after the last “undocumented alien” was back on the right side of the border.

But I’ll be honest: this idea gives me the willies.

Think about it: when was the last time you heard about a federal agency handling any aspect of the immigration issue with cool efficiency. Heck, even the illegals who aren’t criminals (keeping in mind the fact that all illegal immigrants are, by definition, criminals) would be thinking of trying to escape the feds and wriggle their way back into the general population. Imagine the havoc (and danger) that could be wrought when the more than 19,000 convicts currently held in California prisons are trying to hoof it!

Incredibly, there is some degree of common sense being employed by the usually loony California government when it comes to this plan. For example, the convicts who are serving time for sex crimes or violent offenses would not be eligible for release. However, immigrants who committed their crimes while in the U.S. legally would still be turned over for deportation (their convictions would have nullified their “legal” status).

This entire fiasco gives you a good snapshot of the incredibly desperate financial straits in which California currently finds itself. In the grand scheme of things, the $180 million savings wouldn’t even come close to making a dent in the state’s budget woes. How bad is it? Before proposing that immigrants be cut loose from prisons, Schwarzenegger actually floated the idea of cutting funding for poor children’s health care. In political terms, that’s Armageddon.

If you ask me, there’s an air of futility to this entire idea. First off, the governor’s office simply doesn’t have the legal authority to release the prisoners; only the courts can do that, and you can just imagine the Niagra of red tape and delays that will cause. What’s more, California’s government has proposed keeping the prisoners incarcerated until they are cleared for deportation by the courts — and then they’ll simply take them back over the border by bus.

Now if you thought that the U.S. government was inefficient, imagine handing over all these cons to the Mexican government — a government that’s are even less enthusiastic about Mexicans coming into their country than even the most ardent “minute man” on the Rio Grande!

Will this corrupt and questionable regime be able to resist the urge to collect these reprobates in their own buses, drive them to another portion of the US border and let them go? What bureaucrat wouldn’t love to see 19,000 stacks of paperwork and headaches jump over the border to become the paperwork and headache of some other country’s bureaucrat?

REVENUE BREAKDOWN – Obama’s Spending Spree

REVENUE BREAKDOWN – Obama’s Spending Spree

By Stephen Wellman
June 5, 2009

 

This will cover spending and tax revenues for the week starting June 1, 2009. It was a busy week for the US TREASURY and one of the highlights was Tim Geithner’s meeting in China. Laughing students aside, he had a tough act to sell! Yet he kept to the same script the US FED and US TREASURY have been saying for decades now their mantra of STRONG DOLLAR … STRONG DOLLAR. Its their mantra but not their practice.

BLS WAGES

BLS data for wages that was released on June 4th to NO FANFARE … The FANFARE that moved the DOW that day was for the small dip in unemployment claims. Meanwhile if you read the hidden details, like I do, you see that there has been some massive hour cuts for American workers for the Q1 2009. That reflects perfectly with my collapse scenario for the US PAYROLL WITHHOLDING TAX REVENUES. If workers work less hours then there will be less tax revenues. Even here in Hawaii Governor Lingle is making State employees take mandatory three day furloughs(no pay) every month in order to cut costs.

What stuck out was this report on the MANUFACTURING SECTOR:

Manufacturing

Productivity decreased at a 2.7 percent annual rate in the manufacturing sector during the first quarter of 2009, reflecting a 21.7 percent decrease in output and a 19.5 percent decrease in hours (tables A and 3). These were the largest-ever declines in the output and hours series, which begin with data for the second quarter of 1987. Over the last four quarters, manufacturing productivity fell 3.2 percent, the largest four-quarter decline in the series (tables A and 3). This contrasts with the 3.7 percent average annual increase from 2000 to 2007. In the durable goods manufacturing subsector, output declined 31.0 percent and hours fell 23.0 percent, yielding a productivity decline of 10.4 percent. In nondurable goods industries, productivity rose 1.9 percent as the decline in output of 11.6 percent was less than the 13.2 percent decline in hours.

Hourly compensation in manufacturing grew 13.4 percent during the first quarter of 2009, reflecting a 15.8 percent rise in durable goods industries and a 10.1 percent rise in the nondurable goods industries (seasonally-adjusted annual rates). Real hourly compensation, which takes into account changes in consumer prices, increased 16.1 percent for all manufacturing workers. Unit labor costs rose 16.6 percent in manufacturing during the first quarter of 2009, after increasing 17.1 percent in the fourth quarter of 2008. Over the last four quarters total manufacturing unit labor costs increased 12.0 percent, the largest increase in the series.

These moves represent the BIGGEST moves since 1987. So things are falling off a cliff for America’s manufacturing base. I have also reviewed this same info for the State Of California and it is confirmed. The biggest drops in payroll for California are Construction and Manufacturing. The reports don’t really say why, but I imagine it is due to closing doors or moving out! Interesting the two sectors which show the least decline in employment are mining and healthcare. Healthcare in California is stable.

So productivity decreases while wage costs increase. Hummmmm??? NEXT!

US TREASURY DAIIY STATEMENT

Well on June 3rd, 2009, the US TREASURY spent $22.332BIL USD on Social Security benefits in 24 hours. That put our SPEND RATE up to 6.00. The US TREASURY only took in $7.559BIL USD in tax revenues on June 3rd and out of that $7.449BIL was from US PAYROLL TAX REVENUES. How much tax did the US corporations pay? $52mil. Those rich people with their Estate taxes only paid in $3mil USD that day.

Here is the LINK to the US TREASURY DAILY STATEMENT for June 3, 2009.

So how much have we spent on Social Security for FY 2009 so far? Around $385.7BIL USD and how much on TARP? Around $321.4BIL USD … not much difference. But on UNCLASSIFIED we have spent way over what we spend on Social Security at $413.6BIL USD. Between OTHER and UNCLASSIFED we have spent a combined total of $1.777TRIL USD and the media is dead silent. There’s so much money in the system on a daily basis the US TREASURY can’t even line item it!

TRUST FUND IOUS IN LAYMAN’S TERMS

There has been much talk about how the US TREASURY “borrows” from the Social Security Trust Fund. If only that were the only Trust Fund they hand IOUs to!

On every US TREASURY DAILY STATEMENT is a term called GOVERNMENT ACCOUNT SERIES. First TABLE III-B refers you back to TABLE III-A where there is a breakdown of both “marketable”(bills, notes and bonds) and “nonmarketable”(intergovernment debt). As anyone with eyes can plainly see the vast majority of “debt” is in the “Government Account Series” line item in the “non-marketable” section of both TABLES III-A and III-B. Just think of that BIG number as the UNFUNDED LIABILITY number for US CONgress to borrow from the Social Security and Medicare Trust Funds and many other trust funds you probably have never heard of. This is the magic hocus-pocus of IOUs that are suppose to be repaid in our lifetime.

So this stuff is “ON-BUDGET” and “OFF-BUDGET”. The “OFF-BUDGET” debt did not start until 1937 during the Great Depression, under FDR, but it has steadily grown since then just like everything that BIG GOVERNMENT does. Once again both DEMS and REPS have been guilty of growing the gross DEBT; both are experts at fiscal irresponsibility.

Back to the Government Account Series. These are non-marketable securities, implicit debt, guaranteed by the US government. They are mainly TRUST FUNDS. This chart of TRUST FUNDS is from the Financial Management Service, a bureau of the US TREASURY. I think it is important to get a perspective on just how widespread this addiction to SPEND has become. It has infested all manners of solvent entities and turned them into IOU ridden wards of the state.

The following TABLE FD-3 is only reported monthly, so March 2009 is the last data point.

Here is the LINK to the website that publishes these tables. Click on “Federal Debt”.

You can see that the US government owes these Trust Funds a total of trillions.

I found this statement from the FMS … “Government account series (FD-2)—Certain trust fund statutes require the Secretary of the Treasury to apply monies held by these funds toward the issuance of nonmarketable special securities. These securities are sold directly by Treasury to a specific Government agency, trust fund, or account. Their rate is based on an average of market yields on outstanding Treasury obligations, and they may be redeemed at the option of the holder. Roughly 80 percent of these are issued to five holders: the Federal Old-Age and Survivors Insurance Trust Fund; the civil service retirement and disability fund; the Federal Hospital Insurance Trust Fund; the military retirement fund; and the Unemployment Trust Fund.”

The BIG FIVE!!

I’ll bet they are “special”! I just hope we never find out just how “special” they really are!

There are also “marketable bonds” as per Table III-B of the US TREASURY DAILY STATEMENT. Every BOND issued by companies or governments has a “Redemption Value” upon maturity whereby the company, or in this case the government, pays to redeem it.

So in the end should the US TREASURY count these securities or “IOUs” when they borrow from a multitude of Trust Funds? The idea is that these “IOUs” will be made good when they are due or “mature”. So in theory as these IOUs mature the government must print money to pay them if there are no tax revenues to cover them. I personally am not counting on getting any checks from Social Security by time I retire. I also doubt I am going to have Medicare, but instead some Third World version of UNIVERSAL HEALTHCARE that is tantamount to a Medicare default.

Just because all this is listed on the US TREASURY DAILY STATEMENT don’t get the idea that all these numbers add up and make sense … THEY DON’T! Try to add up the OTHER total with the breakdown that is listed for OTHER, it never adds up.

This is the stuff that the GAO has been complaining about for decades now and is the main reason that David Walker(former GAO Chief)quit.

So next time when you hear someone compare the US government to ENRON, you’ll know why. More to the point you’ll know where ENRON got all their ideas from! Yet the S&P gives out their AAA rating … AAA is virtually worthless in my opinion, but then again I am not CHINA or the millions of people out there sitting in cash on the sidelines using Treasuries or FDIC accounts. By the way the US government even borrows from a trust fund entitled “Deposit Insurance Fund”. Hummmmmm??? I wonder if that is related to the FDIC.

All this info is available to the public so feel free to do your own research. When was the last time any of this was discussed in the SITUATION ROOM or on SQUAWK BOX or on OPRAH? Nobody wants to know the real truth and even after going on 60 MINUTES, David Walker walked away completely convinced that the US CONgress is just that … a CON!

None of this data supports a STRONG DOLLAR POLICY. Strangely enough it all comes from the same entity that Tim Geithner heads, the US TREASURY.

Gold is the only durable hedge against this enormous monetary fraud of the irredeemable currency Ponzi scheme.

GOVERNMENT IS ONLY AS HONEST AS ITS MONEY …

Money Creation at the State Level

BUT GOVERNOR, YOU CAN CREATE MONEY!  JUST FORM YOUR OWN BANK.

Ellen Brown
May 26th, 2009

“I understand that these cuts are very painful and they affect real lives. This is the harsh reality and the reality that we face. Sacramento is not Washington – we cannot print our own money. We can only spend what we have.”
– Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger quoted in Time, May 22, 2009

Christmas comes early, Governor. You CAN print your own money. Fiscally solvent North Dakota is doing it . . . and so can California. Now!!!

In a May 22 article in Time titled “Billions in the Red: Fiscal Reckoning in CA,” Juliet Williams reports that since California voters have now vetoed higher taxes and further state government borrowing, Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger has indicated that he intends to close the budget gap almost entirely through drastic spending cuts. The cutbacks could include laying off thousands of state workers and teachers, ending the state’s main welfare program for the poor, eliminating health coverage for about 1.5 million poor children, halting cash grants for about 77,000 college students, slashing money for state parks, and releasing thousands of prisoners before their sentences are finished. Schwarzenegger bemoaned the fact that the state could not print its own money but said it could only spend what it had.

But the state can create its own money. After all, banks do this every day. Certified, card-carrying bankers are allowed to do something nobody else can do: they can create “credit” with accounting entries on their books. As the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas explains on its website:

“Banks actually create money when they lend it. Here’s how it works: Most of a bank’s loans are made to its own customers and are deposited in their checking accounts. Because the loan becomes a new deposit, just like a paycheck does, the bank . . . holds a small percentage of that new amount in reserve and again lends the remainder to someone else, repeating the money-creation process many times.”

President Obama has also acknowledged that banks create money, through what he calls the “multiplier effect.” In a speech at Georgetown University on April 14, he said:

“[A]lthough there are a lot of Americans who understandably think that government money would be better spent going directly to families and businesses instead of banks – ‘where’s our bailout?,’ they ask – the truth is that a dollar of capital in a bank can actually result in eight or ten dollars of loans to families and businesses, a multiplier effect that can ultimately lead to a faster pace of economic growth.”

Money in a government-owned bank could give us the best of both worlds. We could have all the credit-generating advantages of private banks, without the baggage cluttering up the books of the Wall Street giants, including bad derivatives bets, unmarketable collateralized debt obligations, mark to market accounting issues, oversized CEO salaries and bonuses, and shareholders expecting a sizeable cut of the profits. A state could deposit its vast revenues in its own state-owned bank and proceed to fan them into 8 to 10 times their face value in loans. Not only would it have its own credit machine, but it would control the loan terms. The state could lend at ½% interest to itself and to municipal governments, rolling the loans over as needed until the revenues had been generated to pay them off. According to Professor Margrit Kennedy in her 1995 book Interest and Inflation-free Money, interest composes, on average, fully half the cost of every public project. Cutting costs by 50% could make currently-unsustainable projects such as low-cost housing, alternative energy development, and infrastructure construction not only sustainable but actually profitable for the government.

If all this seems too radical and unprecedented to venture into, consider that one state has had its own bank for 90 years; and it has not only escaped the credit crunch but is doing remarkably well . . . .

THE INNOVATIVE BANK OF NORTH DAKOTA

Only three of fifty states are now solvent, meaning they have the revenues to meet their state budgets; and one of them is North Dakota. It is an unlikely candidate for the distinction. It is a sparsely populated state of less than 700,000 people, largely located in isolated farming communities afflicted with cold weather. Yet since 2000, the state’s GNP has grown 56%, personal income has grown 43%, and wages have grown 34%. The state not only has no funding issues, but this year it actually has a budget surplus of $1.2 billion, the largest it has ever had.

North Dakota boasts the only state-owned bank in the nation. The Bank of North Dakota (BND) was established by the state legislature in 1919 specifically to free farmers and small businessmen from the clutches of out-of-state bankers and railroad men. The bank’s stated mission is to deliver sound financial services that promote agriculture, commerce and industry in North Dakota. By law, the state must deposit all its funds in the bank, which pays a competitive interest rate to the state treasurer. The state rather than the FDIC guarantees the bank’s deposits, which are plowed back into the state in the form of loans. The bank’s return on equity is about 25%, and it pays a hefty dividend to the state, which is expected to exceed $60 million this year. In the last decade, the BND has turned back a third of a trillion dollars to the state’s general fund, offsetting taxes. The former president of the BND is now the state’s governor.

The BND avoids rivalry with private banks by partnering with them. Most lending is originated by a local bank. The BND then comes in to participate in the loan, share risk, and buy down the interest rate. The BND provides a secondary market for real estate loans, which it buys from local banks. Its residential loan portfolio is now $500 billion to $600 billion. Guarantees are also provided for entrepreneurial startups, and the BND has ample money to lend to students (over 184,000 outstanding loans). It purchases municipal bonds from public institutions, and it backs loans made to new farmers at 1% interest. The BND also has a well-funded disaster loan program, which helps explain how Fargo, when struck by a disastrous flood recently, managed to avoid the devastation suffered by New Orleans in similar circumstances.

North Dakota has also managed to avoid the credit freeze, through the simple expedient of creating its own credit. It has led the nation in establishing state economic sovereignty. In California and other states, workers and factories are sitting idle because the private credit system has failed. An injection of new money from a system of publicly-owned banks on the model of the Bank of North Dakota could thaw the credit freeze and bring spring to the markets once again.

A Tax Note for Federal Contractors

Are you still paying State Sales Tax on Indirect Expenses relating to Federal Contracts?   You shouldn’t be!

Many moons ago I co-sponsored a successful battle with the California Franchise Tax Board, obtaining a change to their rules on this matter.  We obtained several years worth of refunds for my Aerospace employer of the time, plus opening the door for other Federal Contractors to do the same.

What’s good for the Goose is good for the Gander, and the same rule should apply in other states.

I bring this up because I’ve discovered that some Federal Contractors don’t seem to be aware of the rule, and are paying the tax.

The rule change we got enacted specifically exempted all Indirect Expense items relating to Federal Contracts from Sales Tax.  In cases where the Expense could not be specifically allocated to Federal Contracts vs other buckets, we were able to apply a pro rata rule.

Check with your Accounting Department to see what they’re doing.  You may be entitled to a refund.